Disclaimer: The information contained on this site is for information purposes only, and may not apply to your situation. The author, publisher, distributor and provider provide no warranty about the content or accuracy of content enclosed. Information provided is subjective. Keep this in mind when reviewing this guide. Neither the Publisher nor Author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages resulting from use of this guide.  All links are for information purposes only and are not warranted for content, accuracy, or any other implied or explicit purpose.

 

WEST MAGIC TIBETAN MASTIFFS

WHY I WOULD NEVER RECOMMEND GETTING INVOLVED WITH THE AKC. I HAVE BEEN THREATENED, LIED ABOUT, AND NEVER, EVER, WANT TO BE PART OF THIS ORGANIZATION BECAUSE OF THE HORRIBLE EXPERIENCES AND VERY NASTY PEOPLE THAT I HAVE ENCOUNTERED THAT ARE PART OF IT. THERE ARE MUCH BETTER THINGS IN LIFE TO GET INVOLVED WITH. BASED ON MY EXPERIENCES WITH AKC; THE REASON TO REGISTER YOUR DOG IS NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE A SYMBOL OF QUALITY OR INTEGRITY, RATHER, TO PROTECT YOUR DOGS FROM LIARS, THEIVES, AND THE ORGANIZATION ITSELF. I HAVE COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE AKC IS MUCH LIKE THE MAFIA. IT'S "APPEARS" TO ME YOU HAVE TO "PAY FOR PROTECTION". WHY DID THE AKC SUSPEND RON BOMBLISS OF KESANG CAMP AND NOT SUSPEND A BREEDER WHO PUBLICLY SOLD HIS DOG WITHOUT HIS PERMISSION WHEN THE AKC WAS LOOKING FOR THAT DOG IN AN AKC INVESTIGATION? THE SAME GROUP OF AKC SUPPORTERS WHO ALLOWED THEIR FRIENDS TO POST THAT HE AND OTHERS "NEED BULLETS" PUBLICLY ON THEIR FACEBOOK PAGES AMONG OTHER THINGS. NOPE, TOO DANGEROUS OF A SPORT FOR ME AND MY DOGS. I MAY NOT AGREE WITH PEOPLE BUT I CERTAINLY WOULD NOT INCITE PUTTING BULLETS INTO OTHERS OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF PHYSICAL HARM. COULD THE AKC HAVE TARGETED RON BOMBLISS BECAUSE HE WOULD NOT GIVE THEM 100% REGISTRATIONS? COULD YOU BE TARGETED LIKE MR. BOMBLISS BY REGISTERING YOUR DOGS WITH AKC? WHAT BASIS DID THEY HAVE TO TARGET HIM? HE HAD NOT REGISTERED A DOG WITH AKC IN OVER TWO YEARS. I HAVE SEEN THE INTIMIDATION THE AKC USES AND IT REMINDS ME OF THE MAFIA.

REGISTRY OF INTEGRITY? READ THE EMAIL BELOW DESCRIBING HOW AN AKC SHOW BREEDER FEELS ABOUT THE ACCURACY OF THE REGISTRY. DOESN'T SOUND TO ME THAT THIS PERSON IS INTERESTED IN HAVING AN ACCURATE PEDIGREE AS LONG AS THE DOG LOOKS GOOD, DOES IT? about incorrect dnaBASED ON MY EXPERIENCES WITH THE AKC AND MANY SO-CALLED "ETHICAL BREEDERS OF MERIT"; I BELIEVE I WILL GET A MUCH HEALTHIER DOG WITH AN "ACCURATE" PEDIGREE FROM SOMEONE WHO DOESN'T BREED FOR A LIVING, DOESN'T BREED THE SAME TWO SIRE AND DAM YEAR AFTER YEAR, DOESN'T SHOW IN THE AKC, SOMEONE WHO HEALTH TESTS THEIR DOGS, AND DOESN'T BREED TONS AND TONS OF DOGS YEAR AFTER YEAR. WHY DO I BELIEVE THIS? I HAVE SEEN TOO MUCH FRAUD AND DISHONESTY WITH AKC BREEDERS BREEDING FOR THE SHOW RING. SADLY, WHEN MONEY AND COMPETITION ARE THE MOTIVE; SO TOO GOES THE BREED AND ETHICS.

I FIND IT VERY INTERESTING THAT THIS BREEDER HAS PUBLICLY STATED THEY WOULD NOT BUY A DOG (SEE IMAGE ). YOU SEE, THESE TYPE OF BREEDERS HAVE BEEN KNOWN TO RUN AROUND AND GET DOGS IN WAYS I WOULD NOT, THEN BASH THE BREEDER OF SAID DOGS, WHILE USING THEM IN THEIR OWN LINES. THEY ARE ALWAYS LOOKING "FOR A DEAL" AND THEN CHARGE YOU TWICE AS MUCH. I DO NOT RECOMMEND SUPPORTING THESE AKC SHOW BREEDERS HABIT OF SHOWING. AFTER ALL, SOMEONE HAS TO PAY FOR THE "MEANINGLESS" CHAMPIONSHIP. THEY WILL PASS THE COST ON TO YOU.

wont buy a puppy

THE BREEDER OF MY TIKA, KESANG CAMP HAS BEEN SLANDERED FOR MANY YEARS BY THESE SO CALLED ETHICAL SHOW BREEDERS, YET KESANG CAMPS LINES ARE VERY PREVELANT IN THEIR LINES. SO WHAT IS THE DEAL? IF THE BREEDER WHO WROTE THE EMAIL ABOVE REALLY BELIEVED WHAT THEY SAID; WHY ARE THEY USING KESANG CAMP DOGS? IF THEY WON'T BUY FROM KESANG CAMP, HOW ARE THEY GETTING KESANG CAMP DOGS? ARE THEY SENDING PEOPLE UNDERCOVER WITH ALIASES TO BUY THEM? IF THEY REALLY BELIEVED KESANG CAMPS PEDIGREES WHERE INCORRECT, OR UNHEALTHY, WHY WOULD THEY USE THEM IN THEIR BREEDING PROGRAMS. THIS PARTICULAR BREEDER CONVENIENTLY ACQUIRED A KESANG CAMP DOG (REMEMBER THEY WOULD NEVER BUY FROM KESANG CAMP)

own a kesang camp dog

AND BRED THE DOG. WAS IT PLANNED? WAS THE PERSON SENT TO KESANG CAMP TO BUY THE DOG FOR HIM? I DON'T KNOW, BUT IT SEEMS TO ME THAT IF YOU ARE GOING TO BASH SOMEONE AND THEIR DOGS, WHY WOULD YOU WANT ONE? HYPOCRISY?

FALSIFIED PEDIGRESS THAT GO WITHOUT BREEDER SUSPENSION. THE AKC SEEMS TO NOT CARE IF THE PEDIGREES ARE CORRECT AS LONG AS HIGH VOLUME PUPPY FARMS / SO CALLED "BREEDERS OF MERIT" GIVE THEM 100% REGISTRATIONS! IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT ANYBODY CAN BE A "BREEDER OF MERIT" IF THEY GIVE THE AKC 100% REGISTRATION. NO HEALTH CHECKS! NO DNA PROFILES BEFORE BREEDING, AND NO MICRO CHIPS!

THE PROBLEM GETS WORSE! KESANG CAMP HAS MODIFIED HIS CONTRACT BECAUSE OF BREEDERS LIKE THIS WHO HAVE BEEN USING HIS LINES ALL THE WHILE SLANDERING HIM. THEY EVEN FALSIFY PEDIGREES. ONE BREEDER DID THIS AND A COMPLAINT WITH TONS OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS WAS SUBMITTED TO THE AKC ALONG WITH THE $500.00 YOU HAVE TO PAY THEM IN ORDER FOR THEM TO DOG THEIR JOB OF MAKING THE REGISTRY ACCURATE. I WAS ALSO TOLD THAT IF YOU SUSPECT PEDIGREE FRAUD; YOU HAVE TO GET PERMISSION FROM THE "ALLEGED" PERSON FILING THE FALSE PEDIGREE IN ORDER TO COMPARE THE DNA? DOES THIS MAKE SENSE? SERIOUSLY? YOU HAVE TO GET PERMISSION FROM THE PERSON WHO IS ALLEGEDLY FALSIFYING THEIR PEDIGREES? I WAS TOLD BY ONE SO CALLED ETHICAL BREEDER THAT THE AKC IS NOT THE POLICE AND THEY CAN'T FORCIBLY MAKE A PERSON TELL THEM WHO THEY SOLD A DOG INVOLVED IN AN INVESTIGATION. I GET THAT. MY QUESTION TO THIS SO WELL ESTABLISHED BREEDER IS "WHY DO THEY SUSPEND ONE BREEDER FOR FAILING TO OPEN THEIR RECORDS AND NOT THE ONE WHO WOULD NOT TELL THEM WHO THEY SOLD THE DOG THE AKC WAS LOOKING FOR IN AN AKC INVESTIGATION? ISN'T THAT FAILING TO DISCLOSE RECORDS AND HIDING INFORMATION? SO YOU SEE; IT'S ALMOST AS IF EVEN WELL ESTABLISHED BREEDERS DO NOT WANT TO KNOW THAT THE PEDIGREES ARE CORRECT AS LONG AS THE DOGS "LOOK GOOD" AND WIN IN THE SHOW RING, REGARDLESS IF THE PEDIGREES ARE CORRECT. LIKE I SAID; THESE ARE THE CONCLUSIONS AND OPINIONS I HAVED FORMED BASED ON MY DIRECT EXPERIENCES.

HERE IS THE AD SHOWING A BREEDER SELLING A DOG THEY KNEW BELONGED TO KESANG CAMP. THEY DID NOT OWN THE DOG. I HAVE EMAILS FROM THE PERSON IN POSSESSION OF THE DOG WHILE THEY WHELPED A LITTER OF PUPPIES BELIEVED TO BE SIRED BY THE DOG SOLD WITHOUT HIS OWNER'S PERMISSION. THE FOLLOWING AD WAS PLACED "PUBLICLY" BY THE BREEDER WHO SOLD HIM KNOWING WHO HIS OWNER WAS AND THAT HIS OWNER WAS LOOKING FOR HIM. NOW I DO NOT KNOW WHAT THE TRUTH IS. ONLY THAT THERE ARE MANY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS LITTER THAT NO ONE SEEMS TO WANT TO VERIFY INCLUDING THE AKC. YOU LOOK THROUGH THE FOLLOWING IMAGES AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF. FINALLY, I BELIEVE THAT IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE WHY HIDE IT?

sellingmaxKOKO

ON A SIDE NOTE. FOR ALL THE SLANDERING OF KESANG CAMP BY THESE SO-CALLED ETHICAL BREEDERS; ISN'T IT INTERESTING THAT BOTH THESE DOGS WHO WERE RAISED AS PUPPIES BY KESANG CAMP ARE DESCRIBED AS HAVING SUCH "WONDERFUL" TEMPERMENTS?

HERE IS ANOTHER AD BY THE SAME BREEDER ADVERTISING SELLING DOGS FOR TERMINAL OWNERS. I GET PEOPLE EMAILING ALL THE TIME AND MANY PEOPLE HAVE SIGNED NON BREEDING CONTRACTS WITH KESANG CAMP DOGS AND THEN BREED THEM ANYWAY. SOME AT ONLY A YEAR. WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT DOG SHOWS AND COMPETITION COULD BE SUCH A HORRIBLE SPORT?

THE FOLLOWING ARE THE EMAILS FROM THE PERSON IN POSSESSION OF KESANG CAMPS MAXIMUS AND THE DAM OF THE LITTER IN QUESTION WHEN SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN GOING INTO HEAT. (see images below dated April and may 2014) PUPS WERE BORN IN AUGUST. PHOTOS OF PUPPIES IN POSSESSION OF person who sent emails BELOW IN SEPT.

BREEDER WHO TOLD THE AKC THEY DID NOT KNOW WHERE MAXIMUS IS TELLS SOMEONE IN TEXT THEY DID NOTHING WRONG?

THESE POSTS ARE FROM THE PERSON IN POSSESSION OF MAXIMUS AND LUCY DURING HER HEAT AND BELOW ARE PHOTOS OF A GOLD AND BLACK AND TAN PUPPY BELEIVED TO BE THE PUPPIES REGISTERED AND WHOSE SIRE WAS DETERMINED NOT TO BE THE FATHER. SIRE IS THE DOG MENTIONED IN THE GOFUND ME POST WHICH WAS IMMEADIATLY DELETED. NOTICE THE BLACK AND TAN PUPPY EVEN HAS THE SAME EYES AS MAXIMUS.

AFTER PUBLICLY SELLING THIS DOG WITHOUT PERMISSION THE BREEDER TOLD THE AKC THEY DID NOT KNOW WHERE THE DOG WAS. HE WAS ALLEGED TO BE THE SIRE IN A COMPLAINT MADE BY THE SENDER OF THE FOLLOWING EMAIL:THIS HAPPENS TO BE A VERY HIGH VOLUME AKC SHOW BREEDER WHO REGISTERS MANY DOGS. IN CONTRAST THE OWNER OF THIS KESANG CAMP DOG. KESANG CAMP WAS SUSPENDED FOR THE "EXCUSE" OF "NOT DISCLOSING RECORDS". THE DIFFEERENCE IS THAT KESANG CAMP HAD BEEN BOYCOTTING THE AKC, AND HAD NOT REGISTERED A DOG WITH THEM IN TWO YEARS BECAUSE OF THE FRAUD HE HAD SEEN IN THE AKC. AKC HOWEVER, DID NOT SUSPEND THIS HIGH VOLUME SHOW BREEDER FOR NOT REVEALING WHO THEY SOLD HIS DOG TO WITHOUT HIS KNOWLEDGE OR PERMISSION EVEN THOUGH THEY HAD PLENTY OF DOCUMENTS TO SUPPORT THAT THE BREEDER DID KNOW EXACTLY WHO THEY SOLD THE DOG TO. DOUBLE STANDARDS? INTIMIDATION? FRAUD? YOU DECIDE. QUITE FRANKLY, I AND MANY OTHERS BELIEVE THE AKC IS NOT A REGISTRY OF INTEGRITY. THERE ARE MANY, MANY, MANY, ARTICLES TO SUPPORT THE MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE COME TO THE SAME CONCLUSIONS. COULD BE INTIMIDATED LIKE KESANG CAMP FOR NOT BENDING TO THEIR FABRICATED ACCUSATIONS? ARE INNOCENT BREEDERS DOG'S BEING STOLEN, USED, AND THEN REGISTERED BECAUSE OF AKC DOUBLE STANDARDS AND LOOPHOLES? YOU DECIDE.

wendy email

BELOW IS AN EMAIL FROM THE PERSON WHO FILED THE COMPLAINT. SHE SAID THE PERSON WHO SOLD KESANG CAMPS MAXIMUS TOLD THE AKC THEY DID NOT KNOW WHERE HE WAS OR THE SIRE. HOWEVER, THE SAME BREEDER STARTED A GOFUND ME PAGE AND WHEN SOMEONE POSTED ABOUT THE SIRE SHE HAD GOTTEN FROM THEM IT WAS ALMOST IMMEADIATELY DELETED. WHY? WHY WOULD THEY NOT TELL THE AKC TO WHOM THEY SOLD KESANG CAMP'S MAXIMUS OR WHERE THE SIRE WHO WAS LISTED ON THE LITTER WAS? WHY DID THE AKC NOT TAKE ACTION AGAINST THEM? INSTEAD THE AKC HAVING ALL THE DOCUMENTS YOU SEE HERE DECIDED TO LET IT END ALLOWING FOR THE BREEDER WHO SOLD MAXIMUS AND NOT TELL THEM WHERE EITHER THE SIRE LISTED OR WHERE MAXIMUS WAS FREE TO COLLECT DNA AND SUBMIT AGAIN UNDER A DIFFERENT NAME. IT COULD HAPPEN AND THE AKC HAS LEFT THE LOOP HOLE OPEN FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF A FRUADULENT PEDIGREE.

suzie

BELOW IS A POST BY AN AKC BREEDER OF MERIT AND PROVISTIONAL JUDGETO THE BREEDER WHO SOLD MAXIMUS WITHOUT HIS RECORDED OWNER'S PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE. SHE WAS TALKING ABOUT THE QUESTIONED LITTER THAT WAS IN POSSESSION OF THE PERSON SENDING EMAILS DURING AND AFTER THE DAM'S HEAT.

BELOW IS A FUNDRAISER THE BREEDER WHO TOLD THE AKC SET UP. THE FIRST POST (SEE IMAGE BELOW) IS FROM A WOMAN WHO WAS IN POSSESSION OF THE SIRE LISTED ON THE LITTER. THIS WAS THE DOG THE BREEDER TOLD THE AKC THEY DID NOT KNOW WHERE HE WAS. THIS POST WAS ALMOST IMMEADIATELY DELETED! WHY WAS THAT?

gofund me

THE FOLLOWING EMAIL WAS WRITTEN BY AN AKC PROVISIONAL JUDGE INVOLVED THE COMPLAINT AGAINST THE BREDER AS THEY WERE THE BREEDER OF THE DAM THAT HAD THE PUPPIES. THE DAM WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE BRED BECAUSE SHE DID NOT PASS HER HEALTH TESTS WAS WHAT I WAS TOLD BY THEM. SO BASED ON THESE EMAILS AND MORE TO FOLLOW, I HAVE COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT AKC IS NOT A REGISTRY OF INTEGRITY, NOR A SIGN OF QUALITY. NO HEALTH TESTING, NO DNA PROFILES ON FILE BEFORE BREEDING AND WHEN A PEDIGREE IS IN QUESTION IT JUST MAY BE THAT THE PERSON HIDING INFORMATION MAY NOT BE SUSPENDED BECAUSE THEY ARE "WELL CONNECTED" OR ARE SUPPLYING THE AKC WITH TONS OF REGISTRATIONS? THAT IS THE WAY I SEE IT BASED ON THE WORDS OF THE SO CALLED ETHICAL BREEDERS OF THE AKC WHO SEEM TO "STICK TOGETHER" LIKE GLUE WHEN IT BENEFITS THEM. FOLLOW THE MONEY!!!!!

WELLCONECTED

ANOTHER POST AND EMAIL BY AN AKC PROVISIONAL JUDGE ABOUT BREEDER WHO SOLD A DOG THAT SHE KNEW DID NOT BELONG TO THEM AND WHO DID NOT DISCLOSE TO THE AKC WHO THEY SOLD THE DOG TO.

BELOW IS THE LETTER SUMMARIZING THE INVESTIGATION. THE INVESTIGATION WAS LAUNCHED BY THE BREED OF THE DAM, LOUISE. BASED ON THE DOCUMENTATION IT WAS ALLEGED THAT MAXIMUS AND LUCY WERE THE PARENTS OF THE LITTER IN QUESTION. DOCUMENTATION ABOVE SHOWS THAT EMAILS SHOWING THE PERSON WHO WAS SUPPOSEDLY DYING WAS IN POSSESSION OF BOTH OF THEM BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER LITTER WAS BORN.

THE BREEDER WHO WAS INVESTIGATED AND IT WAS FOUND THAT THE PEDIGREE WAS WRONG HAD PREVIOUSLY STATED THEY HAD DNA ON FILE FOR ALL THEIR STUD DOGS. SO YOU WOULD THINK THEY COULD HAVE JUST COMPARED THE DNA ? I DON'T KNOW BUT IT DOESN'T LOOK TO ME LIKE THIS BREEDER IS BEING HONEST. I MEAN REALLY, THEY SAY THAT THE SIRE OF THE LITTER IS WHO THEY SAY AND THEY CAN PROVE IT. THE AKC DID PROVE THE SIRE OF THE LITTER WAS NOT THE CORRECT SIRE AND WHEN THEY ASKED THIS BREEDER WHO THEY SOLD THE SUSPECTED SIRE TO; THEY CLAIMED THEY DIDN'T KNOW? WHY IS THAT? WHAT ARE THEY HIDING? AND WHY WASN'T THIS BREEDER FINED AND SUSPENDED FOR WITH HOLDING THE INFORMATION FROM THE AKC? SEEMS TO ME THAT THE AKC HAS TWO SETS OF RULES. ONE FOR IT'S HIGH VOLUME CORPORATED PUPPY FARMS AND ONE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT BREEDING HUNDREDS OF DOGS.

D.B. LIES AGAIN?

WHAT DOES THIS LETTER MEAN? IT SEEMS TO ME THEY HAVE "LEFT THE DOOR OPEN" FOR ANYONE TO MICRO CHIP MAXIMUS AND THEN SUBMIT THE DNA UNDER YET ANOTHER NAME? I COULD BE WRONG BUT IT LOOKS THAT WAY TO ME? WHY WOULD THEY DO THAT WHEN PEOPLE ARE ASKING FOR THE TRUTH? THE ALLEGED SIRE KESANG CAMPS MAXIMUS IS THE SON OF THE GIRL I OWN, KESANG CAMPS NUBIA. I HAVE HAD DNA ON FILE FOR NUBIA WITH THE AKC FOR MANY YEARS. WHEN I EXPRESSED MY CONCERNS THAT HIS SON WAS SOLD WITHOUT HIS RECORDED OWNER'S PERMISSION, AND WAS THE SUBJECT OF THE DNA INVESTIGATION ABOVE, THEY SENT ME THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE.

I HAD TO WONDER IF SOMEONE SOLD A DOG THAT DID NOT BELONG TO THEM, AND WAS APPARENTLY HIDING HIM BECAUSE THEY DID NOT WANT HIS DNA COLLECTED; WHY WOULD THEY GIVE ME PERMISSION TO COMPARE THE DNA? (see image below) THAT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO ME. ISN'T THAT LIKE ASKING A THIEF FOR YOUR MONEY BACK? EVEN IN CHILDREN'S SPORTS ORGANIZATION, THERE IS A "GOVERNING" BOARD THAT WILL ADDRESS BLATANT DISREGARD FOR RULES AND BEHAVIOR. AKC HAS IGNORED ALL THOSE WANTING JUSTICE FOR MAXIMUS AND ALL THE OTHER DOGS WHO HAVE SUFFERED IN THEIR HIGH VOLUME CORPORATE PUPPY FARMS UNDER THE AKC FALSE SENSE OF QUALITY AND HEALTH.

WHAT I believe MAKES THIS REALLY BAD IS THAT THE DAM OF THIS LITTER WAS SOLD WITHOUT BREEDING RIGHTS!!!!!

sold without breeding rights

WHY DID THE AKC EVEN REGISTER THE LITTER? WHY HAS THE AKC NOT GONE IN AND MICROCHIPPED AND DNA'D ALL THE DOGS PRODUCED BY THIS BREEDER? ACCORDING TO THE KENNEL INSPECTION REPORT THE BREEDER POSTED PROUDLY ON THEIR FACEBOOK PAGE; THEY HAD 40 DOGS TOTAL IN "CAGES". OF THOSE ONLY 16 WERE MICROCHIPPED!! THIS PARTICULAR BREEDER BREEDS TWO DIFFERENT LARGE BREEDS AND THIS IS A BIG RED FLAG IN MY OPINION FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. (see image below of ad selling Mixed Breed puppies.) THIS ALSO BEGS ANOTHER QUESTION. HOW CAN ONE PROPERLY SOCIALIZE SO MANY LARGE DOGS? 40 dogs, 24 hours in a day? That does not leave much time to properly socialize that many dogs by my estimation? I AM OF THE OPINION THAT KEEPING SUCH A LARGE BREED DOG IN "CAGES" ONLY MAKES THEM AGGRESSIVE. MANY OTHERS SHARE MY THOUGHTS ON THIS. WHY? BECAUSE PUTTING THESE DOGS SIDE BY SIDE IN SMALL "CAGED RUNS" DAY AFTER DAY CAN LEAD TO FENCE FIGHTING AND FRUSTRATION. YOU CAN BATHE THEM AND GROOM THEM TO MAKE THEM LOOK GOOD BUT CAN YOU REALLY PROPERLY SOCIALIZE THAT MANY DOGS AND KEEP TRACK OF THE CORRECT BREEDERS WITHOUT PROPER IDENTIFICATION?

I RECEIVED THIS EMAIL FROM A WOMAN WHO BOUGHT A PUPPY FROM ANOTHER LARGE BREEDING FACILITY (ON 40 ACRES). SHE TOLD ME SHE THOUGHT HER PUPPY'S FATHER WAS KESANG CAMPS MAXIMUS, THE DOG WHO WAS SOLD WITHOUT HIS PERMISSION BY THE BREEDER WHO WOULD NOT TELL THE AKC WHO THEY SOLD HIM TO IN THE INVESTIGATION.

AKC SAYS IT DOES NOT DETERMINE OWNERSHIP BUT BEG TO DIFFER. IF YOU HAVE NO SIGNATURE AND SIGN OVER TO A PERSON WHO IS NOT THE RECORD OF OWNER IN YOUR REGISTRY; HOW CAN YOU SAY YOU DO NOT DETERMINE OWNERSHIP? I AM NOT UNDERSTANDING. BELOW PLEASE NOTE THAT THE AKC SIGNED OVER A LITTER APPLICATION WITHOUT THE OWNER OF THE SIRE. ABSOLUTELY NO SIGNATURE AT ALL!!! ARE AND YOUR DOG PROTECTED WHEN YOU REGISTER A PUPPY WITH THE AKC? I PERSONALLY DO NOT THINK SO BASED ON WHAT I HAVE SEEN THEM DO.

SEVERAL SO CALLED "ETHICAL" AKC SHOW BREEDERS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THIS INFORMATION. THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON AND YET THEY REMAIN SILENT. WHY? FOR FEAR OF THE AKC RETALIATING AGAINST THEM? BECAUSE THEY ALL HAVE KESANG CAMPS LINES IN THEIR PEDIGREES AND THEY DON'T WANT TO PLACE A CLOUD OVER THEM? OR ARE THEY JUST AS CORRUPT AND DECEPTIVE AS THE BREEDERS IN QUESTION?

Silkbow

forged my sig

THE FOLLOWING WAS A CONVERSATION BETWEEN ME AND THE TM RESCUE. I WAS ACCUSED OF BREEDING A LITTER THAT WAS REGISTERED WITHOUT MY SIGNATURE OR KNOWLEDGE. THE AKC HAD MY EMAIL ON FILE BUT NEVER BOTHERED TO CALL ME TO VERIFY THAT I HAD SIGNED THE PAPERWORK!!!!!!

COST TO SHOW!!! WHO PAYS FOR THIS?

costtoshow

BUT DOES A CHAMPIONSHIP REALLY MEAN ANYTHING? - The FOLLOWING THINGS HAVE BEEN CONVEYED TO ME MANY TIMES BY AKC SHOW BREEDERS AND HANDLERS AND ONLY VERIFY ALL THE THINGS I WAS TOLD ABOUT THE POLITICS OF THE SHOWRING. IT REALLY ISN'T ABOUT THE BEST DOG I.M.O.; IT'S ABOUT WHO HAS THE MONEY AND TIME TO INVEST IN SUCH A SCAM? WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? WHAT ARE YOU PAYING FOR?

1. IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW MANY TITLES HE HAS. A JUDGE IS GOING TO PUT UP THE BEST DOG IN THE RING ON THAT DAY.

2. MAYBE THE JUDGES DID NOT KNOW THE STANDARD. OUR BREED IS STILL FAIRLY RARE AND STILL FAIRLY NEW TO AKC. I STILL RUN INTO JUDGES THAT HAVE NEVER SEEN A TM BEFORE. THEY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE OTHER THAN A FEW PICTURES THEY HAVE SEEN. THERE ARE JUDGES WHOSE OPINIONS I RESPECT BECAUSE OF THEIR EXPERIENCE WITH THE BREED, AND JUDGES WHOSE OPINIONS MEAN NOTHING BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE A CLUE.

3. MAYBE THE OTHER DOGS IN THE RING AT THAT TIME XXX WAS BEING SHOWN HAD WORSE FAULTS THAN HIM. THE BEST DOG OUT OF A RING FULL OF BAD DOGS IS STILL NOT A GOOD DOG. . . JUST THE BETTER OF THE BAD.

SO NOT ONLY DO I FEEL AN AKC REGISTRATION IS A WORTHLESS PIECE OF PAPER WITH NO GUARANTEE OF OWNERSHIP, PEDIGREE, QUALITY, OR HEALTH; I believe IT IS A MAJOR "SCAM" ! THE SHOW BREEDER'S AND HANDLER COMMENTS ABOVE DEMONSTRATE BAD SPORTMANSHIP AND THE INABILITY TO ACCEPT THAT SOME DOGS CAN BEAT THEIR DOGS WITHOUT A HANDLER NOT BECAUSE THE JUDGES ARE INCOMPETANT as IN THEIR WORDS, BUT MAYBE JUST MAYBE THEY ARE JEALOUS THAT SOMEONE ACTUALLY HAS A BETTER DOG THAN THEM. MONEY CAN'T BUY EVERYTHING; ESPECIALLY ETHICS, MORALS, AND COMMON DECENCY AS EVIDENCED BY THIS HORRIBLE ORGANIZATION THAT I CONSIDER TO BE VERY MUCH LIKE THE "MAFIA". SERIOUSLY, PEOPLE SUGGESTING THAT OTHER PEOPLE "NEED BULLETS" ?

WHAT I HAVE LEARNED FROM THE PEOPLE WHO YOU WOULD LEAST EXPECT IT IS THAT THE AKC SHOW BREEDERS DON'T EVEN BELIEVE IN THE INTEGRITY OF THE SHOWRING. I DO NOT HAVE THE RESPECT I ONCE THOUGHT FOR THEM. I HAVE BEEN TOLD BY SOME OF THESE BREEDERS THAT THE JUDGES DO NOT KNOW THE STANDARD AND THAT BASICALLY THEY PUT UP WHAT EVER DOG THEY "THINK" IS THE BEST OF A BUNCH OF BAD DOGS IN ANY GIVEN SHOW. I HAVE ALSO BEEN TOLD SOME JUDGES DON'T "HAVE A CLUE" AND PEOPLE STANDING RINGSIDE HAVE TOLD ME THAT UNLESS YOU HAVE A HANDLER; YOU MOST LIKELY WILL NOT WIN. THESE PEOPLE HAVE SHOWN ME NOT ONLY HOW MEAN THEY ARE BUT THEY ALSO REVEALED THE TRUE POLICTICS AND "BOND" AMONG THE AKC "FOLLOWERS". THERE ARE A FEW BREEDERS THAT ACT AS IF THEY ARE ETHICAL AND HAVE INTEGRITY BUT WHAT THIS THEY HAVE DEMONSTRATED TO ME IS THAT THEY WILL ATTACK ANYBODY AND THEIR DOGS TO WIN. PLEASE DON'T SUBJECT YOURSELF TO THE THREATS, AND THE LIES THAT I HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO BY THE PEOPLE YOU WOULD LEAST EXPECT IT FROM. YOU WILL BE SORRY AND YOU WON'T GET A BETTER DOG. IT IS QUITE POSSIBLE YOU WON'T EVEN GET WHAT YOU THINK YOU ARE GETTING. THE AKC IS NOT A WELCOMING ORGANIZATION AT ALL IN MY OPINION. WEALTHY PEOPLE WHO PAY PEOPLE TO SHOW THEIR DOGS AND GOD FORBID IF SOMEONE WINS WITHOUT A WELL CONNECTED HANDLER; THEY WILL USE ALL THE EXCUSES THEY HAVE USED TO BELITTLE AND ATTACK ME ON ANYBODY ELSE WHO POINTS OUT THE UNFAIRNESS OF THE SHOW RING. WHY ON EARTH WOULD ANYBODY WANT TO BE PART OF SUCH A HORRIBLE ORGINIZATION? NO HEALTH CHECK REQUIRED. NO DNA REQUIRED. NO MICROCHIPS REQUIRED AND PEOPLE CAN LITERALY REGISTER ANYTHING WITHOUT ANY KIND OF VERIFICATION! I HAVE FOUND THESE PEOPLE TO BE PART OF THE AKC "SHOW CULT". AS THEY HAVE SAID IN THEIR OWN WORDS, ACCURATE PEDIGREES ARE NOT IMPORTANT AND THE JUDGES APPARENTLY HAVE NO CLUE HOW TO JUDGE THE DOGS! WOULDN'T THAT BE A SCAM? I WOULD RECOMMEND TO ANYBODY THAT UNLESS YOU ARE THICK SKINNED AND NASTY; THE AKC IS NOT SOMETHING TO GET INVOLVED WITH. ALL BASED ON MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCES.

MAKING YOUR OWN MAJOR and CHAMPION

SOME BREEDERS WILL "MAKE THEIR OWN MAJORS". THIS MEANS THEY BRING ENOUGH OF "THEIR OWN" DOGS TO "MAKE A MAJOR". FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND A MAJOR CONSISTS OF BEATING 3 OR 5 OTHER DOGS OF YOUR OWN BREED. IN ORDER TO "MAKE A MAJOR" YOU NEED AT LEAST FOUR DOGS. AS AN EXAMPLE, A BREEDER WOULD NEED TO BRING AT LEAST FOUR OF THEIR OWN DOGS IN ORDER TO GET A THREE POINT MAJOR. YOU NEED THREE "MAJORS" TO GET A DOG A "CHAMPIONSHIP". THIS IS A MUCH MORE ECONOMICAL WAY TO "CHAMPION" YOUR DOG. THEY WILL BRING SOME OF THEIR "PET QUALITY" DOGS THAT THEY KNOW THE DOG THEY WANT TO "CHAMPION" WILL BEAT. INSTEAD OF HAVING TO SHOW AGAINST DOGS THAT MAY BEAT THEIR DOG BECAUSE THEY MAY BE A BETTER EXAMPLE OF THE BREED OR HAVE A WELL CONNECTED HANDLER; THEY CAN "CHAMPION" THEIR DOG IN A LITTLE AS THREE SHOWS SAVING THEM TIME, AND LOTS OF MONEY!

BY BRINGING FOUR OF YOUR OWN DOGS 4 X $25.00 ENTRY = $125.00 YOU are GUARANTEED a major in one show for the price of paying a highly connected "handlers".

THIS SAVES THEM LOTS AND LOTS OF MONEY!!!!!! (RESULTS ARE POSTED PUBLICLY ON ONOFRIO.COM AND JIM RAU DOGS SHOWS LTD.)
for an explanation of MAKING A MAJOR AND KENNEL WINS CUT AND PASTE THE FOLLOWING LINKS: (Disclaimer) Not intended to "bash" any particular breeder. Just as a demonstration as to how a major "could" be made.

http://www.kaibabbmd.org/node/1149

http://www.bajoronkennel.com/Major%20wins%20explained.html

WHAT THEY DO TO NON SHOW AKC BREEDERS WHO WON'T COVER FOR THEM AND PLAY THEIR GAME. THEY LIE AND SLANDER INNOCENT PEOPLE TO GET THEM TO SHUT UP. THE BREEDER WHO SOLD A DOG THAT DID NOT BELONG TO HER, WAS QUESTIONED ABOUT HIS WHERE ABOUTS, SAID THEY DID NOT KNOW WHO THEY SOLD HIM TO ARE ALL PART OF THIS SAME GROUP. THE FOLLOWING ARE EXAMPLES OF "PUBLIC" COMMENTS MADE BY THEM AND THEIR FRIENDS INTENDED TO SHUT GOOD PEOPLE UP: THE PERSON ACCUSING OTHERS OF UNFOUNDED, UNTRUE, CRIMINAL ACTS HAS NEVER EVEN MET THE PEOPLE they SLANDER. THE BREEDER WHO SLANDERED INNOCENT PEOPLE BELOW HAS BEEN RELENTLESSLY SLANDERING KESANG CAMP FOR MANY, MANY, YEARS. I HAVE MANY POSTS BY THIS SAME "SELF PROCLAIMED" ETHICAL BREEDER SLAMMING PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD WITH LIES ALL THE WHILE DEFENDING THE BREEDER WHO SOLD A DOG WHO DID NOT BELONG TO THEM, KEPT PUPPIES FROM A DAM WHO HAD A NON BREEDING CONTRACT, KEEPS 35+ DOGS IN "CAGES", AND BREEDS LOTS OF DOGS. THEY ASSOCIATED WITH PEOPLE WHO ADVERTISE THEIR DOGS AS TRAINED SERVICE DOGS BY BUSSINNESS THAT DO NOT TRAIN SERVICE DOGS. ALL THINGS THIS PERSON SLANDERS RON BOMBLISS OF KESANG CAMPS OF DOING. I THINK THERE IRRESPONSIBLE SLANDERING OF OTHERS HAS LED TO THE DEMISE OF THE BREED THEY CLAIM TO LOVE. :( IT IS VERY IRRESPONSIBLE FOR PEOPLE TO POST PUBLICLY HOW THEY WANT TO "PUT BULLETS" IN PEOPLE BUT APPARENTLY THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WITH THE CRAZIES IN THE AKC OVER DOGS AND COMPETITION. NO, AS YOU CAN SEE MY EXPERIENCES WITH THE AKC HAVE BEEN A NIGHTMARE. DO YOU REALLY WANT TO BE PART OF AN ORGANIZATION WHERE THIS STUFF HAPPENS? I PERSONALLY DO NOT WANT TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH PEOPLE. DON'T BE FOOLED WITH BREEDERS "CLAIMING" INTEGRITY, CHARGING FEES TO REGISTER YOUR DOGS IN THEIR DATA BASES AND REGISTRIES. NOT SURE WHY THIS PERSON IS SO FIXATED ON SLANDERING KESANG CAMP WHEN THEIR GROUP OF FRIENDS HAVE PARTICIPATED IN SO MUCH DECEPTION TO GET HIS DOGS? YOU HAVE TO WONDER SOMETIMES WHAT MAKES SOME PEOPLE "TICK". YOU JUST MIGHT FIND YOURSELF ON THE RECEIVING END OF THE SLANDER DEMONSTRATED BY THE POSTS BELOW. I DON'T HAVE TO AGREE WITH EVERYONE AND I DON'T. I WON'T BREED DOGS FROM KENNELS WHO SLANDER OTHERS ALL THE WHILE THEY USE THEIR DOGS.

I HAVE LEARNED NOT TO USE DOGS FROM KENNELS WHOSE PEDIGREES HAVE BEEN QUESTIONED OR WHO HAVE TOLD ME THEY DO NOT CARE IF THE PEDIGREES ARE CORRECT. IT IS THESE TYPE OF HYPOCRITICAL PEOPLE WHO ARE RUINING THE BREED. THEY THINK THEY CAN GET SOMEONE'S LINES BELIEVING THE PEDIGREE IS INCORRECT, AND JUST BECAUSE THEY DNA THE DOG THEY GET IT IT WILL SOMEHOW MAKE IT CORRECT? NO, THEY ARE GIVING YOU THE "ILLUSION" THEY ARE ETHICAL. IT DOESN'T CHANGE THE FACT THAT THEY BUY AND BREED DOGS WHOSE PEDIGREES THEY QUESTION. I THINK THEY ARE JUST OUT TO MAKE THEMSELVES "APPEAR" TO BE SOMETHING THEY ARE NOT.

I WANT TO KNOW MY PEDIGREE IS CORRECT; NOT FOR "THE LOOK OR MONEY" IN THE SHOW RING AND THAT IS WHY I WILL NOT REGISTER WITH "PERSONAL" REGISTRIES OR THE AKC.. SO YOU SEE HOW CRAZY AND NUTTY THE WORLD OF COMPETITION AND AKC DOG BREEDING IS. IT'S A SICK THING IN MY MIND. ONE I DO NOT WISH TO BE PART OF UNTIL THE HANDFUL OF AKC SHOW BREEDERS WHO COULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE SPEAK UP! THE FOLLOWING POSTS WERE PUBLICLY DISPLAYED ON FB BY SOME OF WHAT I WOULD CONSIDER TO BE DANGEROUS PERSONS. THESE SAME PERSONS MAKE THEMSELVES OUT TO BE VERY ETHICAL. DO YOUR RESEARCH OR YOU JUST MAY BE ANOTHER "VICTIM" OF THEIRS.

NEED BULLET

puppyinrescueblackpuppylie

I DON'T KNOW BUT IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THE BREEDER WHO WAS INVESTIGATED SEEMS TO TELL THINGS THAT ARE NOT TRUE WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE. (SEE ABOVE). I DON'T OWN, NOR HAVE I EVER BRED A DOG FROM THIS BREEDER. NEVER WANT TO. IN MY CONTRACT I FORBID ANY DOG FROM THIS BREEDER BEING BRED TO OR USED WITH ANY OF MY DOGS OR PUPPIES. WHY? BECAUSE OF ALL THE LIES THEY HAVE TOLD ABOUT ME. THIS BREEDER ACCUSED ME OF PUTTING A BLACK PUPPY IN A SHELTER BUT CANNOT PROVE SO BECAUSE IT JUST IS NOT SO. ABOVE IS A PHOTO OF THE BLACK PUPPY IN A HOME WITH A VERY NICE FAMILY. I SEE HIM REGULARLY AS HE AND HIS SISTER LIKE TO GO FOR WALKS WITH HIS MOM AND DAD :) SO AS YOU CAN SEE; THIS BREEDER SEEMS TO HAVE A PATTERN OF NOT TELLING THE TRUTH? AT LEAST THAT HAS BEEN MY EXPERIENCE. I WOULD NEVER TRUST THE PEDIGREES OF SOMEONE LIKE THIS. WHY DID THE AKC NOT SUSPEND THIS BREEDER? FOR NOT TELLING THEM WHO THEY SOLD THE DOG THEY DID NOT OWN TO AND WHOM THEY WERE LOOKING FOR THE DNA INVESTIGATION? I DON'T UNDERSTAND. IS IT BECAUSE THE BREEDER WHO WAS SUSPENDED DID NOT REGISTER A DOG WITH AKC IN OVER TWO YEARS? DOES THE AKC TWEAK IT'S RULES FOR THEIR HIGH VOLUME MULTI BREED SHOW BREEDERS? I DON'T KNOW BUT THAT IS THE IMPRESSION I GET. IT'S AMAZING THAT ANYBODY WOULD BUY A PUPPY FROM SOMEONE LIKE THIS. IT'S TOO BAD THAT THE AKC IS GIVING PEOPLE A FALSE SENSE OF "QUALITY" TO BREEDERS LIKE THIS. I LEARNED THE HARD WAY WHAT THEY ARE REALLY ABOUT. IT'S BAD FOR THE UNSUSPECTING PUPPY BUYERS AND THE POOR DOGS WHO HAVE TO LIVE IN HIGH VOLUME CORPORATE PUPPY FARMS. IT IS MY BELIEF THAT BREEDING DOGS FOR A LIVING CAN NEVER BE GOOD FOR THE ANIMALS.

WHAT IS INTERESTING ABOUT THE FOLLOWING IS THAT THIS IS THE SAME PERSON WHO WROTE THE LIES ABOVE ABOUT PEOPLE "BREAKING AND ENTERING", ETC. LIES ABOUT PEOPLE THEY NEVER MET. THE SAME PERSON WHO WOULD LIKE YOU TO PAY THEM MONEY TO REGISTER YOUR DOGS IN THEIR REGISTRIES (I.E. PRESERVATION REGISTRIES). WOULD YOU PAY PEOPLE WHO BEHAVE THIS WAY ANYTHING? I KNOW I WOULD NEVER GIVE THEM ONE DIME!. THIS SAME PERSON HAS SLANDERED MANY MANY PEOPLE INCLUDING MR. BOMBLISS WITHOUT EVER HAVE SEEN THE THINGS THEY REPEAT OR EVER MEETING THOSE THEY SLANDER. THIS PERSON IS ALSO FRIENDS WITH THE PERSON WHOSE FRIENDS SAY PEOPLE "NEED BULLETS". THIS ARE THE TYPE OF PEOPLE INVOLVED WITH THE AKC AND WHOM THE AKC SEEM TO SUPPORT. THIS SAME INDIVIDUAL HAS LIED OVER AND OVER AGAIN ABOUT MR. BOMBLISS, MAKING STATEMENTS ABOUT HIM THAT THEY HAVE NOT WITNESSED. PEOPLE WHO WANT TALK ABOUT PEOPLE NEEDING BULLETS CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED MENTALLY ILL. IT IS THE ONLY EXPLANATION I CAN THINK OF. JUDGING BY HER STATEMENT BELOW; I WOULD HAVE TO QUESTION HER MENTAL STATUS. SEE BELOW

garns about slander

HERE IS YET ANOTHER SCAM BY THE AKC! AGAIN, BASED ON WHAT I HAVE SEEN FROM SO CALLED "ETHICAL" BREEDERS, THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE ACCURACY OF THE PEDIGREE, MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE BREEDING. I HAVE TO WONDER IF THE HEART, HIP, AND SEIZURE ISSUES IN THE TIBETAN MASTIFF BREED HAVE NOT BEEN CAUSED BY THESE AKC SHOW BREEDERS? COULD IT BE BECAUSE THEY HAVE BRED BROTHERS TO SISTERS, MOTHERS TO SONS, WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING IT? OR CARING ABOUT IT? WITH SO MANY "LOOPHOLES" IN THE AKC, WHICH COULD LEAD TO STOLEN DOGS, ETC. WHO KNOWS WHAT THEY ARE BREEDING? HERE IS YET ANOTHER SCAM!!

FINALLY, MY KIDS HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN MANY SPORTS AND WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN ABLE TO CONTACT THE GOVERNING BODY TO RESOLVE ANY ISSUES OF INPROPIETIES, ABUSE, OR BAD BEHAVIOR. SADLY, I HAVE FOUND THIS IS NOT AN OPTION FOR AKC CONSUMERS. I HAVE FOUND THE OPPOSITE TO BE TRUE.BASED ON MY EXPERIENCES THE AKC WILL JUST IGNORE YOU IF YOU QUESTION ANY OF THE POLICY INFRACTIONS SHOWN ABOVE. IT'S SAD THAT YOU AS A CONSUMER SEEMINGLY HAVE NO RECOURSE WHEN YOU SUSPECT ABUSE, FRAUD OR BAD BEHAVIOR IN THE AKC. I HAVE FOUND DOG SHOWING AND PUREBRED DOG REGISTRATION TO BE ONE OF THE NASTIEST "SPORTS" I HAVE EVER ENCOUNTERED. I USED TO THINK OF THE AKC AS "QUALITY". NOT SO ANYMORE. I THOUGHT DOG OWNERSHIP WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT RAISING DOGS YOU LOVE AS FAMILY PETS AND NOT SOME "SYMBOL" FOR ONE'S OWN SELF GRATIFICATION. SADLY, THIS IS WHAT I HAVE TAKEN AWAY WITH MY EXPERIENCES WITH THE AMERICAN KENNEL CLUB. I have been told many times that you have to have a "thick skin" to endure the AKC. I don't want to grow a thick skin. I just want to know that when I send in my AKC registration paper; I as an owner and my dog will be protected from these unscrupulous breeders. I want to know that the pedigree is accurate. UNFORTUNATELY, THIS HAS NOT BEEN MY EXPERIENCE WITH THE AMERICAN KENNEL CLUB.

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION HERE TO INITIATE MANDATORY DNA AND MICRO CHIP WITH EVERY AKC REGISTRATION!

CUT AND PASTE THIS LINK FOR MORE AKC SCAMS!: http://malamutes.
weebly.com/caution---akc-scam.html

MORE INFO ABOUT THE SHOW SCAM

SHOWING EXPLAINED - THE PRESSURE TO LIE, CHEAT, AND STEAL TO SELL DOGS FOR MORE MONEY AND GIVE YOU THE CONSUMER A FALSE SENSE OF "QUALITY".

Flag Counter

IS A TIBETAN MASTIFF RIGHT FOR ME?

You may ask yourself, is a Tibetan mastiff right for me? This is a very unique breed and their are many plus and minuses to owning one. You should consider all their characteristics before deciding on bringing a Tibetan mastiff into your home. It is a 10-15 year commitment! Click on the following link for more information about Tibetan Mastiffs and Tibetan Mastiff Puppies.